![]() ![]() Am I remembering that right? Does this beg the question, under what conditions is the increased BR best used for? I'm mostly looking to use it for studio work where I expect to keep the ISO to 200. I recall reading somewhere that the higher the ISO, the more headroom there is to increase the bit rate. When I move to a higher ISO, 800 or so, then the increased bit rate numbers go way up to around 60. ![]() When I push that setting up to 2.0 or even 3.0 (audio off), it seems to only go up a bit to mid 40's. I am getting a bit rate readout on the LCD screen while filming of upper 30's. Mostly interested in the higher bit rates for compression. I installed the Jbuild for the 600D (the latest I think). TWO QUESTIONS ON BIT RATE AND OVERHEATING Regardless, glad to have ML back in service, and thanks again. The ONLY difference is that all of the ones tried prior to the final successful attempt were downloaded as. Some relevant (?) data: All of the firmware files referenced in this exercise are exactly the same file size, and equal the size referenced in the "read me" included in the downloads. This morning I risked a download of 1.0.2 from a site that I did not recognize as reputable, meaning it wasn't a major or common site relative to photography, however this copy successfully installed (down-graded) as expected! Afterwards, I searched and found a copy of 1.0.2 online at a major (reputable?) support site, and tried using that one also without success. None of these three worked as described in my original post. To review, I had a 1.0.2 firmware copy originally downloaded from Canon stored in three places (on the card in camera itself - the one from which ML normally runs), a dedicated installer card (from which I updated the camera back when I first started using ML) and on my computer. ![]() This morning I downloaded another copy of the 1.0.2 firmware from a different site, and repeated the usual steps. All of those things I'd already done repeatedly to no avail. considering age of the 600D?)Īll help much appreciated! Use ML lots and miss it already. actually selecting the 1.0.2 version from LCD menu (I see both versions displayed), but shortly after receive message on lines of "sorry buddy, this ain't happenin' remove battery"Īny tips on how I can force camera back to 1.0.2? (or, what are chances developer is possibly going to tickle ML file to be compatible with this firmware version (1.0.3), esp. If I put both firmware 1.0.3 AND 1.0.2 on SD card, I can get further through the upgrade steps in camera. red indicator LED blinks slowly is all that happens. I believe I've tried everything in firmware update (downgrade) attempts! When I have 1.0.2 on SD only, camera hangs between starting firmware upgrade step and screen where I would pick the version. Working directly off SD card for all downgrade attempts (not connected to Mac 10.6/Utility for any of my tries). Have not been able to succeed in any downgrade attempts back to 1.0.2. So I was already running a compatible firmware version/ML build on 600D/T3i for years (fmwr 1.0.2), and stupidly installed Canon's 1.0.3 last night. Assuming this is the correct location to post following(?). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |